Consistency of Performance
of Intra-Operative Radiotherapy Equipment – Photon Radiosurgery
System
K. S. Armoogum, J. M. Parry, C. D. Mackay, S.
Souliman
Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Tayside University Hospitals NHS Trust, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.
The past
20 years have seen increasing use of more conservative methods to treat early
stage breast cancer 1.
Intra-Operative RadioTherapy (IORT) avoids unnecessary treatment of the whole
breast and delivers a critical dose to the tumour bed only. It is currently
being investigated whether a single high dose of radiation will impart the same
clinical benefit as a standard course of external beam therapy (typically 6
weeks).
Ninewells
Hospital has four Photon Radiosurgery Systems (Carl Zeiss Surgical GmbH)
currently used to treat breast and neurological tumour sites. The PRS comprises
a portable x-ray generator, control console, bespoke QA tools and a mobile
gantry. To comply with the Ionising Radiations Regulations 2 we
investigated the dosimetric characteristics of each source and its performance
stability during individual treatments as well as over a period of
time.
Methods
Characteristics
investigated were half value layer, output decay factor, internal rate monitor
(IRM) reproducibility and depth-doses in water.
The half
value layer was
determined by the broad beam method, in which the x-ray probe was placed 20 cm
away from the ionisation chamber, with high purity aluminium attenuators placed
at the midpoint 3. To
ascertain the effects of beam hardening at clinical depths, a solid water
attenuators of 5 and 10 mm was placed between the x-ray probe and the aluminium
attenuators, approximately 2 cm away from the probe. To
determine the constancy of output from the x-ray sources, the ion chamber
current was monitored over a typical clinical treatment time of 30 minutes to
deduce an output decay factor.
IRM
reproducibility was investigated under various exposures 4.
Exposures were controlled using a pre-set number of IRM counts at a count rate
of approximately 7 x 104 counts per second. Beam parameters of 50kV
and 40µA were used. Measurements were made for exposures corresponding to counts
of 4, 20, 40 and 60 x 106, equivalent to exposures of 1, 5, 10 and 15
minutes. Calculated and actual treatment times terminated on IRM limit were
recorded for 16 patients. Depth-dose curves in water were obtained by measuring
the chamber output at distances of between 10 and 35 mm away from the
probe.
The
equivalent energies for the beam attenuated by 5 and 10 mm of solid water were
derived from data tables in ICRU Report 17 and found to be approximately 12 and
24 keV respectively. The average output level over a period of 30 minutes was
found to be 98.9%. The average difference between the preset IRM limit and the
IRM count on beam termination was found to be less than 0.5%. For breast IORT,
the average difference between the calculated and actual treatment times was
found to be 0.30% (0.47% for neurological treatments). It was found that beam
attenuation in water varied by approximately 1/r3
(Fig.1).

Figure
1: Dose in water versus distance over the range 10-35 mm at 50kV and
40µA.
The
x-ray sources have proven to be stable over time. Most measurements were found
to lie within the manufacturer’s tolerances and an intercomparison of these
checks suggests that the four x-ray sources have similar performance
characteristics.
[1]
Baum M,
Vaidya JS, Mittra I. Multicentricity and recurrence of breast cancer. Lancet, 1997: 349:208.
[2]
Ionising
Radiations Regulations (1999). SI No. 3232. HSE, London.
[3]
Beatty
J, Biggs PJ, Gall K, Okunieff P, Pardo FS: A new miniature x-ray device for
interstitial Radiosurgery: Dosimetry. Med. Phys.,
1996:23:53-62.
[4]
Biggs
DS, Thomson ES: Radiation properties of a miniature x-ray device for
radiosurgery. Br J Radiol, 1996:69:544-47.